≡ Menu

Documented, but is it real?

by Reed Johnson.

An unusual number of this year’s Oscar contenders for best picture are based on true events: “The Social Network,” “The Fighter,” “The King’s Speech” and “127 Hours.” At least one other nominee, “Winter’s Bone,” although fictional, conveys such a wealth of sociological detail about its rural Missouri setting that it could be used to flesh out a PBS “Frontline” segment on, say, crystal meth’s ravages or squirrel-skinning.

But there’s a parallel trend in documentary filmmaking. With new camera and editing technology allowing documentarians to construct ever-more complex, nonlinear narratives — and filmmakers increasingly employing reenactments, animated sequences, finely drawn characters, humorous or ironic voice-overs and unreliable narrators to get at what they see as “truth” — some documentaries are playing more and more like fictional films.

Read the rest of this article from LA Times.

—–
Sign up now for your own FREE monthly subscription to “The Director’s Chair” filmmaking ezine and get the first 28 pages of my 210 page Film Directing Multi-Media Online course, “The Art and Craft of the Director Audio Seminar.”
—–

Comments on this entry are closed.